Blog & Web Directory on India
    
Advertise    SI Web Directory    Home    About Us     Facebook    Twitter
 
Share

If the Al Queda troglodyte Osama bin Laden can take responsibility for anything beyond 9/11, it’s for the phenomenal growth in the U.S. intelligence apparatus – both domestic and overseas as well as counter-terrorist organizations.

The Washington Post the other day had an interesting piece on the explosive, untrammeled growth in U.S. intelligence organizations post 9/11.

The gist of the Post piece:

The top-secret world the government created in response to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, has become so large, so unwieldy and so secretive that no one knows how much money it costs, how many people it employs, how many programs exist within it or exactly how many agencies do the same work.

Here’s a snapshot:

* U.S. intelligence annual budget – $75 billion, 2.5x the figure on 9/10/2001 (the $75b figure excludes several military and domestic counterintelligence activities)

* 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private firms are said to work on programs concerned with counter-terrorism, homeland security and intelligence in 10,000 locations across the U.S.

* Some 854,000 people hold top security clearances

* 50,000 intelligence reports are published each year, a lot of it likely unread and/or unacted upon

Most of our intelligence folks must be total schmucks because we’re often (at least publicly) in reactive mode whether it’s tackling the guy in the plane or ferreting out the guy in the cave trying to attack us or stopping the Taliban laying the IEDs in Kandahar province. :(

Some Known U.S. Intelligence Agencies

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Director of National Intelligence
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
National Security Agency (NSA)
Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) Continue reading »

Share
 
Share

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was blowing the trumpet this morning that the social networking web site he founded has amassed 500 million users.

Well, that’s quite a milestone.

As Facebook has grown, we guess rivals like Google’s Orkut and Rupert Murdoch’s MySpace are becoming less relevant given that users want to gather at the social networking site that has the maximum number of their friends and family members.

By the way, that 500m number includes us as well although we don’t spend much time on it.

The main reason we’re not that much into Facebook or its rivals is that we’re in the evening of our lives and not craving new friends or looking to connect with old ones.

We guess Facebook (and others of its ilk) are wildly popular with the younger (<30-years) crowd who see it mostly as a forum for harmless clowning, banter, flirting, online sharing of photos et al.

And to think we grew up in a world where being connected (socially or otherwise) meant no more than a distance of 1 or 2 km and the telephone was something only a privileged few had.

Times have changed. And how!

Share
© 2012 SearchIndia.com   Privacy Policy Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha